The perception that younger generations are weaker, less resilient, or more entitled than their predecessors is a long-standing stereotype, but experts argue it may be more about generational context than reality. From being labelled 'snowflakes' to accusations of overspending on luxuries like avocado toast, millennials and Gen Z often face criticism from older cohorts. However, research suggests that this tendency to disparage youth is a centuries-old human instinct, not necessarily rooted in fact.
Professor Peter O’Connor of Queensland Institute of Technology notes that the habit of criticising younger generations has persisted for centuries. Studies indicate that older adults often project their current selves onto their past, leading to an unfair comparison between who they are today and today’s youth. This bias can make each generation seem in decline, regardless of the era.
Recent high-profile remarks have fuelled the debate. In February, British property expert Kirstie Allsopp sparked outrage by claiming young people could afford homes if they cut back on 'luxuries' like Netflix and gym memberships. Similarly, in 2017, Australian real estate mogul Tim Gurner blamed avocado toast for preventing millennials from buying homes, despite soaring house prices and stagnant wages.
Some studies suggest younger generations score higher on traits like neuroticism and need for recognition, and lower on resilience. However, mental health professional Dr Carl Nassar argues that these differences reflect changing societal norms. 'Prior generations were taught to repress instead of express, but for newer generations it’s the other way around,' he says, emphasising that modern values should not be mistaken for weakness.
