A controversial caravan park, constructed on protected green belt land in Cheshire without planning permission, is now likely to be demolished after a retrospective application was formally rejected by the local authority.
Rapid Transformation Sparks Local Fury
The six-acre rural site near Burtonwood was sold on 23 May 2025. Within hours, heavy machinery moved in and began a dramatic transformation that lasted just 72 hours over the May Bank Holiday weekend. Excavators tore up lush pasture, replacing it with hardcore and gravel, while a 10ft-high fence was erected around the perimeter.
Striking before-and-after photos show the rapid change from agricultural field to a grey compound. The site was soon occupied by 13 caravans, four vans, a digger, and three cars. Locals reported non-stop work from 6pm onwards, with the noise and vibration from machinery disturbing residents hundreds of yards away.
Council Enforcement and Application Rejection
Warrington Borough Council launched an investigation following a public outcry, led by local independent councillor Stuart Mann. Almost 50 concerned residents attended a surgery the day after the work was discovered. The council issued an enforcement notice, and the new owner, John Very, subsequently submitted a retrospective planning application for a gypsy and traveller residential site with four pitches.
However, the council has now rejected the bid. In its decision notice, it stated the development does not provide safe and suitable access for all users and lacks pedestrian infrastructure. It deemed the proposal an 'unsustainable form of development' that would have an 'unacceptable impact' on the adjacent road and fail to provide suitable access to local services.
Community Reaction and Legal Process
The development prompted 107 letters of objection from residents who described it as 'green belt vandalism'. One objector wrote that the land had been 'destroyed without any planning permission... with absolutely no regard to the rules or residents.' Only 18 letters of support were submitted.
Councillor Stuart Mann responded to the rejection, stating: 'Many local residents rightly feel frustrated when they follow the rules, submit applications, and wait for decisions, only to see others act first and apply later.' He added that while the process took longer than desired, he was pleased the correct legal process had been followed.
The plot sits on Farmers Lane at its junction with Tan House Lane, an area locals insist is designated solely for agricultural use. The council's decision means the owners now face the prospect of having to rip up the unauthorised development and restore the land.
