A major investigation has uncovered disturbing links between a global movement promoting unassisted childbirth and the tragic deaths of infants. The Free Birth Society (FBS), a lucrative enterprise built on the idea of women giving birth without any medical assistance, is at the centre of these findings.
The Allure and the Danger of 'Wild' Births
Over the course of a year, a Guardian investigation pieced together how the FBS operates as a multimillion-dollar business. It markets so-called 'wild' births through uplifting podcast stories and social media content, radicalising women to reject midwives and doctors during labour. While influencers behind the movement have profited immensely, the human cost has been devastating.
The investigation has connected the society's activities to baby deaths around the world. Mothers, inspired by the empowering narratives shared online, have lost their children after attempting to give birth completely alone. These stories stand in stark contrast to the glossy, curated success tales promoted by FBS advocates.
A Year-Long Probe into Radicalisation and Profit
Investigations correspondent Sirin Kale discussed the findings with Reged Ahmad, exploring why the society's message resonates with so many women. For some, it represents a reclaiming of bodily autonomy and a rejection of what they perceive as an overly medicalised birth industry. The promise of a completely natural, intervention-free experience holds powerful appeal.
However, medical experts universally warn that these practices are inherently dangerous. Childbirth, while natural, carries significant risks for both mother and baby that can escalate rapidly. The absence of trained professionals to handle emergencies like haemorrhage, cord prolapse, or foetal distress can lead to preventable tragedies.
The Aftermath and Ongoing Concerns
The revelations raise urgent questions about the regulation of online health advice and the accountability of those promoting high-risk behaviours. The FBS case highlights a modern phenomenon where social media influence can directly contradict established medical guidance, with fatal consequences.
This investigation serves as a sobering reminder of the complex interplay between personal choice, online radicalisation, and professional healthcare. It underscores the critical importance of accessing evidence-based information during pregnancy and the potentially catastrophic risks of eschewing all medical support during childbirth.
