In a dramatic High Court hearing, actress and model Liz Hurley delivered emotional testimony, alleging that the publisher of the Daily Mail engaged in phone tapping and stole her medical records during her pregnancy. Ms Hurley described these actions as a "brutal invasion of privacy" that left her feeling "crushed" and deeply worried about the impact on her son.
Emotional Testimony from Liz Hurley
Ms Hurley arrived at the Royal Courts of Justice in central London, where she tearfully recounted the alleged phone tapping by Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), the publisher of the Daily Mail. She stated that the act was "monstrous" and "staggering," expressing devastation over the intrusion into her private life. Her concerns extended to her son potentially reading the details of these alleged violations, adding a layer of personal anguish to the legal proceedings.
Prince Harry's Criticism of Associated Newspapers
Prince Harry also testified in the case, strongly criticising ANL for making his wife's life "an absolute misery." He described the legal process as a "horrible experience" and detailed his own concerns about the alleged information gathering by the publisher. The Duke of Sussex highlighted issues related to his past relationships and private discussions, including sensitive conversations about his mother, Diana, Princess of Wales.
High Court Trial Involving Prominent Figures
Liz Hurley and Prince Harry are among seven high-profile claimants suing Associated Newspapers Limited in this ongoing High Court trial. Other notable figures include Sir Elton John, all alleging similar privacy breaches. ANL has strongly denied all allegations, setting the stage for a contentious legal battle that could have significant implications for media practices and privacy rights in the UK.
Allegations of Medical Record Theft and Phone Tapping
The core of the case revolves around claims that ANL not only tapped phones but also accessed and stole medical records, particularly during Ms Hurley's pregnancy. This aspect of the allegations underscores the severity of the privacy invasion, as medical information is considered highly sensitive and confidential. The claimants argue that such actions represent a systematic pattern of intrusive behaviour by the publisher.
As the trial continues, the testimony from Liz Hurley and Prince Harry has drawn widespread attention, highlighting ongoing debates about press ethics, celebrity privacy, and the legal boundaries of journalism in the digital age. The outcome of this case may influence future regulations and public trust in media institutions.
