Prince Harry made a significant appearance at the Royal Courts of Justice on Thursday, 22 January 2026, as part of an ongoing legal battle against the publisher of the Daily Mail. The Duke of Sussex attended court to support the case, which involves multiple high-profile claimants, including Hollywood actress Liz Hurley and Sir Elton John.
High-Profile Court Attendance
Liz Hurley arrived at the Royal Courts of Justice to give evidence on the fourth day of the legal action against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL). Prince Harry, who is also a claimant in the case, was present in court on Thursday, following his previous statements about the impact of ANL's actions on his family.
Harry's Testimony and Allegations
In his testimony, Prince Harry described how ANL's conduct has made his wife Meghan's life "an absolute misery," labeling the experience as "horrible." He expressed that he was unaware he could have filed a claim against the publisher earlier, directly linking his current legal action to their treatment of Meghan.
The Duke of Sussex also discussed his suspicions of "leaky" social circles and referenced articles he deemed "beyond cruel" concerning his mother, Princess Diana, and his former girlfriend, Chelsy Davy. These allegations form part of the broader case accusing ANL of unlawful information gathering.
ANL's Response and Denial
Associated Newspapers Limited, the publisher of the Daily Mail, has strongly denied all allegations of unlawful information gathering brought by Prince Harry, Liz Hurley, Sir Elton John, and other prominent individuals. The company maintains its innocence as the legal proceedings continue.
Broader Implications of the Case
This court case highlights ongoing tensions between public figures and media outlets over privacy and information gathering practices. The involvement of such high-profile claimants like Prince Harry and Liz Hurley underscores the serious nature of the allegations and the potential consequences for media regulation.
As the trial progresses, further evidence and testimonies are expected to shed light on the claims against ANL. The outcome could have significant implications for how media organisations operate and interact with individuals in the public eye.
