A fresh Ashes controversy has erupted, casting a shadow over the third Test in Adelaide and reigniting fierce debate over the reliability of cricket's decision-review technology.
Contentious Dismissal Leaves England Reeling
The flashpoint occurred on day two at the Adelaide Oval when England wicketkeeper-batter Jamie Smith was given out caught behind. The decision was made by the third umpire, who relied on a spike shown on the Snickometer audio technology, despite television replays appearing to show a clear gap between Smith's bat and the ball.
The dismissal proved pivotal, reducing England to 159 for 6 in their first innings, leaving them far adrift of Australia's total. The disbelief in the England camp was palpable, with captain Ben Stokes visibly stunned by the verdict from the officials' booth.
Commentators Call for Snicko to be Scrapped
The incident prompted immediate and severe criticism from a host of former players and pundits. Ex-England spinner Graeme Swann and former fast bowler Steven Finn were among those who lambasted the technology's perceived inaccuracy. Former England women's star Alex Hartley joined the chorus, explicitly calling for Snicko to be removed from the decision-making process.
This was not an isolated incident on a fractious day. The controversy surrounding Smith's wicket followed other technology-related disputes, including a prior DRS review involving Australian batsman Alex Carey, which had already heightened tensions.
Broader Implications for the Series and Technology
The recurring doubts over Snicko's precision raise serious questions for the International Cricket Council. When such marginal calls have the power to decisively swing an Ashes Test match, faith in the system is essential. This episode in Adelaide on Thursday 18 December 2025 has further eroded that trust, leaving players, fans, and commentators alike demanding a thorough review of how technology is deployed in the sport's biggest contests.
As England now stare down the barrel of a heavy defeat, the fallout from this decision will undoubtedly rumble on long after the final ball is bowled in this Test, placing the spotlight firmly back on cricket's often controversial relationship with technology.
