Crispin Glover Faces Serious Legal Battle Over Allegations from British Model
Back to the Future star Crispin Glover is embroiled in a contentious legal dispute, as a British model has filed a lawsuit accusing him of battery and other serious offenses. Glover, through his legal representation, has vehemently denied all allegations, setting the stage for a high-profile court confrontation.
Model's Claims of Control and Assault
In court documents obtained by the Daily Mail, the plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe, alleges that Glover, 61, enticed her to leave her home in the UK with promises of housing and employment in Los Angeles. According to her suit, she discovered after relocating that he expected her to serve as a live-in girlfriend and sex slave, leading to a pattern of control and abuse.
Doe, who is 30 years old and has autism spectrum disorder, claims that Glover first contacted her via social media in 2015. She asserts that their correspondence included strange advances, and she initially viewed him as a friend. In 2023, they met in Dresden, where Glover reportedly showed her Nazi memorabilia, but she maintained contact due to his offers of showbiz opportunities.
In early 2024, Doe moved to Los Angeles, becoming a tenant at Glover's sizable Silverlake residence after giving up her European apartment and selling belongings at his urging. She alleges that Glover tracked her movements, discouraged her from leaving the house, and attempted to control her interactions. As a practicing Muslim, she claims that when she left to attend mosque services against his wishes, he locked her out, leaving her homeless with her cats and belongings inside.
Alleged Physical Altercation and Legal Actions
The lawsuit details a physical confrontation where Doe attempted to retrieve her cats from the property. She alleges that Glover seized her by the neck, placed her in a headlock, and caused a visible wound and scar, with photographic evidence included in the court filing. Following this incident, Glover called the Los Angeles Police Department, falsely portraying her as an unlawful intruder, according to Doe's claims.
Doe describes Glover's subsequent restraining order petition as malicious and fraudulent, noting it went viral and damaged her career and reputation. She insists the order was swiftly dismissed for failure to prosecute, but alleges that Glover continued to harass her and manipulate her into a sexual relationship.
Glover's Firm Denial and Counterclaims
Glover's lawyer has issued a strong rebuttal to the Daily Mail, stating that the actor denies all baseless allegations. The legal team asserts that on March 2, 2024, Glover was the victim of an unprovoked felony assault by Doe at his Los Angeles residence. They claim that LAPD responded, investigated, and arrested Doe, with these facts documented in law enforcement records and the restraining order filed by Glover.
The statement emphasizes Glover's intention to vigorously defend himself and pursue all available relief, expressing confidence that the judicial process will reveal the lawsuit as a meritless fabrication. Law enforcement sources have indicated that Glover reported an assault by a man and a woman on that date, though authorities did not make any arrests, according to TMZ.
Legal Charges and Demands
Doe has filed suit against Glover for multiple charges, including battery, fraud, malicious prosecution, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and wrongful eviction. She also accuses him of violating the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act by using threats of violence to prevent her from exercising her rights and coercing her into a captive sexual relationship.
Her demands include general and special damages to be determined at trial, along with punitive and exemplary damages, lawsuit costs, attorney's fees, and further relief as decided by the court. Doe has requested a jury trial to adjudicate the matter.
This case highlights serious allegations of abuse and control, with both parties presenting starkly different narratives. As the legal proceedings unfold, the outcome will depend on evidence and testimony, potentially impacting Glover's legacy and the plaintiff's pursuit of justice.
