Scientists Demand Stricter Regulation for Ultra-Processed Foods, Comparing Them to Cigarettes
Ultra-Processed Foods Compared to Cigarettes in New Study

A groundbreaking study from three prominent US universities has issued a stark warning, arguing that ultra-processed foods (UPFs) should be subjected to far stricter regulation, drawing direct and alarming comparisons to the tobacco industry.

Hijacking Human Biology

The research, published in the influential journal The Milbank Quarterly, contends that both the UPF and cigarette industries employ remarkably similar strategies. These tactics are designed to evade regulatory scrutiny while simultaneously enhancing product appeal and consumption, which the authors state "collectively hijack human biology."

A Global Health Crisis

The study highlights a mounting global health crisis directly linked to high consumption of these industrially engineered food products. The analysis, spanning data from 50 countries, connects UPFs to soaring rates of obesity, significant neurological changes, and widespread metabolic dysfunction.

In a particularly sobering statistic, the report indicates that in the United States alone, one person dies every four minutes from preventable diseases associated with the regular intake of ultra-processed foods.

Calling for a Paradigm Shift

The core argument of the research is a fundamental shift in how society views these products. The scientists advocate that ultra-processed foods must be evaluated not merely through a traditional nutritional lens, but as addictive, industrially engineered substances.

This reclassification would mirror the historical approach taken towards tobacco, acknowledging their engineered capacity for creating dependency.

Learning from Tobacco Control

Drawing explicit lessons from decades of tobacco regulation, the study calls for robust public health efforts that move accountability away from individual consumer choice and squarely onto the food industry itself.

The proposed policy toolkit includes:

  • Strict marketing restrictions, especially those targeting children.
  • Limiting or removing the availability of UPFs in schools and other settings frequented by young people.
  • Greater transparency in product engineering and ingredient disclosure.

In essence, the research concludes that ultra-processed foods have more in common with cigarettes than with whole foods like vegetables, demanding an equally serious and coordinated regulatory response to protect public health.