Sir Keir Starmer was explicitly warned about a "general reputational risk" associated with Lord Peter Mandelson's relationship with the convicted paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein prior to granting him the prestigious role of ambassador to the United States. This critical information has emerged from a due diligence report compiled in December 2024, which has now been made public following a parliamentary directive.
Due Diligence Report Details Epstein Connections
The released documents, which form an initial batch of papers relating to Lord Mandelson's appointment, summarise what was known about his links with Epstein. The report meticulously notes a series of media accounts detailing these associations, highlighting that their relationship persisted even after Epstein's initial conviction in 2008 for procuring an underage girl.
Continued Association Post-Conviction
Specifically, the due diligence document states that the connection between Lord Mandelson and Epstein continued across the period from 2009 to 2011. This timeframe began when Lord Mandelson was serving as business minister under the Labour government and extended beyond its conclusion. One particularly notable instance cited in the report is that Mandelson reportedly stayed at Epstein's residence in June 2009, while Epstein was incarcerated.
The Government's decision to release these files comes after MPs ordered their publication, shedding light on the vetting process undertaken before such a high-profile diplomatic appointment. The documents underscore the potential controversies and ethical considerations that were weighed during the selection of Lord Mandelson for the Washington role.
This revelation places significant scrutiny on Sir Keir Starmer's judgement and the broader appointment protocols within the Government, raising questions about how reputational risks are assessed and managed in political appointments to sensitive international positions.
