Referee Verdict Revealed on Van de Ven's 'Leg-Break' Tackle on Liverpool's Isak
New Referee Verdict on Isak's Suspected Leg Break

Liverpool and Tottenham Hotspur have been given a fresh verdict from refereeing experts concerning the controversial challenge that left Reds striker Alexander Isak with a suspected broken leg.

The Incident and Immediate Fallout

The serious incident occurred during Liverpool's narrow 2-1 Premier League victory over Tottenham on Saturday. Alexander Isak had just put his side ahead in the second half when he was caught by a sliding tackle from Spurs defender Micky van de Ven.

Isak was forced to plant his leg as he shot, and Van de Ven's challenge made direct contact, resulting in immediate and severe injury. The concern from teammates was evident, and a stretcher was initially called. However, the Swedish international managed to limp off the pitch with assistance from Liverpool's medical staff.

While the club quickly dismissed initial fears of an ACL injury, the suspected diagnosis of a lower leg fracture is equally serious. The full severity and expected recovery time remain unclear, pending further scans and official updates from Liverpool.

Pundits Clash Over Red Card Decision

The tackle has ignited a fierce debate, with many questioning why Van de Ven was not shown a red card during the match. Replays indicated the defender lunged into the challenge with minimal chance of winning the ball.

On Sky Sports' Ref Watch, opinions were sharply divided. Former professional footballer Jay Bothroyd argued forcefully that the tackle warranted a sending-off. "He's lunging, he's out of control," Bothroyd stated. "Every explanation you want to give for a red-card challenge is there. If that's in the middle of the park, that's a red card." He emphasised that the fact Isak had already scored should not have influenced the decision.

In contrast, former Premier League referee Dermot Gallagher defended the on-field decision. Gallagher maintained the challenge was not a red-card offence, suggesting the unfortunate outcome should not dictate the ruling. "I can't see that he's done anything that a footballer wouldn't," Gallagher explained. "Players mistime challenges all the time. He's slightly late... it's not a red card."

Unanimous Agreement on Simons' Dismissal

Both pundits did find common ground on another major incident from the match: the first-half red card shown to Tottenham's Xavi Simons for a dangerous tackle on Virgil van Dijk.

Gallagher clarified that while there was no malicious intent, the nature of the challenge made the dismissal inevitable under modern rules. "Once you see the replay, you can't unsee it," he said. "When VAR sees that, in modern football, it is always going to be a red card. You can't make challenges like that anymore." Bothroyd concurred with this assessment, agreeing the referee made the correct call in sending Simons off.

The focus for Liverpool now shifts to the long-term absence of a key player, while the footballing world continues to dissect a moment that could have significant consequences for the Premier League title race.