In a significant development just weeks before the first Grand Slam of the year, Novak Djokovic has announced his withdrawal from the Adelaide International tournament.
Physical Readiness Takes Priority
The Serbian tennis superstar, a record ten-time Australian Open champion, revealed the decision via a statement on his Instagram stories on Monday, 5th January. Djokovic confessed he feels "not quite physically ready to compete" in the event, which begins on Monday, 12th January.
Expressing personal disappointment, Djokovic referenced his title win in Adelaide two years prior and described the venue as feeling "like playing at home." His statement confirmed a strategic shift in focus, declaring: "My focus is now on preparation for the Australian Open, and I look forward to arriving in Melbourne soon."
Tournament Field and Broader Context
Djokovic's withdrawal is a blow to the Adelaide International, which Tennis Australia had promoted as featuring one of its strongest-ever men's fields. He joins Britain's Jack Draper in pulling out of the Australian swing of tournaments.
The remaining top-20 players in the Adelaide main draw now include:
- Alejandro Davidovich Fokina (World No.14)
- Jiri Lehecka (World No.19)
- Tommy Paul (World No.20)
Many leading players, including those listed above and world No.13 Daniil Medvedev, are currently competing at the parallel Brisbane International event.
Timeline for Australian Open Preparation
With the Australian Open main draw commencing on 18th January, Djokovic now has under two weeks to finalise his physical preparation for his pursuit of an unprecedented 25th Grand Slam singles title. The men's final at Rod Laver Arena, where he last triumphed in 2023 by defeating Stefanos Tsitsipas, is scheduled for 1st February.
This tennis announcement followed another significant statement from Djokovic within 24 hours. On Sunday, he confirmed his complete departure from the Professional Tennis Players Association (PTPA), citing concerns over "transparency, governance, and the way my voice and image have been represented."
The PTPA responded, defending its player-led governance and stating it had been the target of a "coordinated defamation and witness intimidation campaign." They affirmed their commitment to pursuing reforms for all players despite these challenges.
