AI in Education: How Students Are Using ChatGPT for Coursework – Risks and Rewards
Students using AI for coursework sparks education debate

An increasing number of students in the UK are using artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT to complete their coursework, sparking debates about academic integrity and the role of technology in education.

While AI can provide quick answers and assist with research, educators warn that over-reliance on these tools may hinder critical thinking and original work. Some schools have already begun implementing stricter guidelines to detect AI-generated content.

The Rise of AI-Assisted Learning

Generative AI platforms like ChatGPT have become popular among students for drafting essays, solving maths problems, and even generating code. Many see it as a time-saving resource, particularly when facing tight deadlines.

However, experts caution that without proper oversight, students risk producing work that lacks depth or personal insight. "AI can be a useful study aid, but it shouldn't replace the learning process," says Dr. Emily Carter, an education specialist at the University of London.

Schools Respond to the AI Challenge

Several UK schools have started adapting their assessment methods to address the growing use of AI. Some institutions are:

  • Introducing more in-class assessments
  • Using AI-detection software
  • Focusing on oral examinations and presentations
  • Developing assignments that require personal reflection

"We need to teach students how to use AI responsibly rather than simply banning it," explains Mark Williams, headteacher at a secondary school in Manchester.

The Future of AI in Education

As AI technology continues to advance, educators face the challenge of integrating these tools productively while maintaining academic standards. Some suggest that AI literacy should become part of the curriculum, preparing students for a future where human-AI collaboration becomes commonplace.

Meanwhile, universities are reviewing their plagiarism policies to account for AI-generated content, with some considering it a form of academic misconduct when used improperly.