Neighbours of a bungalow in Walderslade, Kent, designated to house migrants under a government dispersal scheme have voiced fears that their street will become unsafe for their grandchildren. The Daily Mail revealed on Saturday that Labour's pledge to close all 200 migrant hotels by 2029 would effectively mean relocating asylum seekers to residential streets nationwide.
Whitehall leak reveals extent of housing plans
A Whitehall leak disclosed that two houses in the village of Walderslade, a suburb of Chatham in Kent, are among approximately 37 properties in the leafy Tonbridge and Malling borough council area likely to be required to accommodate asylum seekers in the coming months. Further enquiries showed that two north London businessmen separately purchased houses in Walderslade late last year, which are believed to have been let long-term to Home Office contractor Clearsprings.
Meanwhile, an Afghan asylum seeker in the village of Laleham, Surrey, was arrested after loitering outside a primary school. It emerged that he was already housed in a similar House in Multiple Occupation, also bought from a London businessman last year.
Residents speak out
Residents of Walderslade, who have previously expressed concern about the two households of six migrants set to arrive on their doorsteps, have now shared their growing anxiety. On the longer of the two cul-de-sacs where Clearsprings has taken out a long lease on a bungalow, lives Jan Howard, 74, a disabled widow and retired accounts clerk. She said: 'I've got two teenage granddaughters that come round here at various times of the day and evening to visit me by themselves – and I know what some people have done. I won't feel safe them coming round any more.'
Ms Howard added: 'This road is a community. Everyone helps everybody, and I sometimes leave my keys in the door by mistake – but someone always knocks and brings them to me. Migrants shouldn't be coming here. I've been told there will be six in the house while they're being processed – then another lot will come in. So we'll never get to know the people who come in. And we're all worried about Ernie, the elderly man who lives right next door to the house involved. He's only recently lost his wife, he's vulnerable and he can do without all this.'
Carer Sara Ryder, 59, who has three grandchildren and lives seconds from the converted bungalow, said: 'We're just so upset because we have grandchildren, and don't know who's going to turn up. The grandchildren have played in the street, but that's not going to happen any more. We reckon when the migrants arrive, they'll be dropped off in the middle of the night.'
Her friend Sue Birch, another carer with five grandchildren who has lived on the cul-de-sac for 22 years, said: 'It's generally only been owner-occupiers here, we've never had anything like this. There's other more suitable places, in central Chatham for example, where there's thousands of flats being built and there are facilities for people like that. What are they going to do here? They're men, and I'm worried they're going to hang around, check us out and make us feel uncomfortable. Would the people who have set this scheme up like them to live next door to them? I don't know who to vote for, I don't know who we can trust. Nothing is really grounded any more – it's completely out of our hands.'
Further concerns from local families
Glynis Coughlan, 68, married to retired driving examiner Peter, lives a few doors from the migrant bungalow. A full-time carer for her disabled son Benjamin Fuller, 36, she said: 'When we moved in it was specifically because we felt the whole close was a safe environment. Nobody comes down here unless they have to, and we walk round here a lot – we bring our son Benjamin, who has cerebral palsy, out on his sit-down scooter. We're worried about migrants arriving because we don't know what type of person they are, and how they're going to react to us. And because we're expecting it to be all men, we feel really uncomfortable. There's better places for migrants, like the closed-down Pontins holiday camp at Camber Sands on the coast an hour's drive away. They could do that accommodation up, they'd have their own rooms in chalets… I voted Reform at the last election. I'm definitely going to do so again now.'
Her son Benjamin, seated on his mobility scooter, added: 'It's scary. I feel vulnerable. I get upset pretty easy, and depressed and anxious. And it's very underhand the way this has been done, without consultation of the people it's going to affect.'
Clearsprings profits under scrutiny
Almost all of the enormous profits made by Clearsprings – which holds the Home Office contract to house migrants across southern England and Wales – go to former teen-disco and caravan park tycoon Graham King. The money he makes from asylum seekers amounts to an astonishing total of almost £100 million a year, and King is predicted to become the migration industry's first billionaire. Clearsprings has not responded to requests for comment.
The Home Office maintains that its policy to close migrant hotels – following multiple protests by neighbours – is the right one, and that it aims to house those dispersed in facilities such as former barracks. However, a Home Office spokesman refused to say what proportion of former hotel occupants would in reality have to be relocated to domestic houses across the country on a similar template to that proposed in Tonbridge and Malling.
