The husband of former political staffer Brittany Higgins, David Sharaz, has been declared bankrupt by the Federal Court in Perth. The ruling was handed down on Tuesday, 16 December 2025, marking a significant financial development for the couple who have remained in the public eye.
Court Proceedings and Financial Status
The Federal Court in Perth officially recorded the bankruptcy order against Sharaz. While the specific details of the debts leading to the bankruptcy were not fully disclosed in the initial reports, the legal declaration signifies he is unable to meet his financial obligations. The court's decision places Sharaz's financial affairs under the control of a trustee.
This development occurs against a backdrop of intense media scrutiny and legal proceedings involving Brittany Higgins and her former employer. Sharaz has been a prominent and vocal supporter of Higgins throughout her public journey following her allegations.
Context and Public Scrutiny
David Sharaz, a former journalist, and Brittany Higgins have been central figures in a national conversation about political culture and accountability in Australia. Higgins's allegations and subsequent legal actions have generated widespread news coverage and political fallout.
The bankruptcy announcement adds a new, personal financial dimension to their story. It is likely to attract further public and media attention, intersecting with the existing narrative surrounding the couple.
The timing of the bankruptcy ruling, just before the Christmas period, underscores the ongoing personal challenges faced by Sharaz and Higgins amidst their continued public profile.
Implications and Next Steps
Under Australian bankruptcy law, the declaration means a trustee will be appointed to manage Sharaz's assets and deal with his creditors. The process typically lasts for three years, during which there are restrictions on his financial activities, including obtaining credit above a certain limit.
There has been no immediate public statement from Sharaz or Higgins regarding the court's decision. The couple's experience continues to highlight the personal costs that can accompany involvement in high-profile public and legal disputes.
As the trustee begins administering the estate, further details regarding the extent of the debts and the assets available may become public through official channels.
