Labour's Shadow Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has launched a fierce condemnation of former US governor Mike Huckabee over what she described as "deeply offensive" comments about Sir Keir Starmer's position on Israel.
The controversy erupted after Huckabee, a former Republican presidential candidate and Arkansas governor, made inflammatory remarks suggesting the Labour leader would fail to support Israel adequately if elected to Number 10.
"Completely Wrong and Inappropriate"
Phillipson didn't mince words when addressing Huckabee's comments, telling Times Radio: "They were deeply offensive, they were completely wrong and they were completely inappropriate."
The Washington-born politician emphasised that such characterisations of Starmer's foreign policy stance were not only inaccurate but crossed lines of diplomatic propriety.
Defending Labour's Foreign Policy Position
Phillipson robustly defended her party leader's track record, highlighting Starmer's consistent support for Israel's right to self-defence while also advocating for Palestinian rights and a two-state solution.
"Keir Starmer has been absolutely clear about the importance of Israel's security, the importance of a two-state solution, and the importance of working with our allies," she stated.
International Scrutiny on UK Politics
The incident highlights the intense international scrutiny facing British political leaders as the general election approaches. Foreign commentators and politicians are increasingly weighing in on UK domestic politics, creating diplomatic challenges for all parties involved.
Phillipson's strong response signals Labour's determination to counter what they see as misinformation about their foreign policy positions, particularly regarding the sensitive Israel-Palestine issue.
A Pattern of Controversial Remarks
This isn't the first time Huckabee has stirred controversy with comments about UK politics. The former governor has previously made headlines for his outspoken views on British political figures and policies, often drawing criticism for their lack of nuance and factual accuracy.
Phillipson's forceful rebuttal reflects growing frustration within Labour ranks about foreign interference in British political discourse, especially when it involves mischaracterisation of their positions on complex international issues.
