Parent Slams Minister's Claim Lawyers Exploit Send Families for Profit
Parent Hits Back at Minister Over Send Lawyers Profit Claim

Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, has faced sharp criticism after alleging that lawyers' objections to policy changes are driven by profit motives. This claim has been labelled as not only incorrect but also deeply offensive to numerous families who rely on legal assistance to obtain support legally guaranteed for children with special educational needs and disabilities (Send).

Parent's Personal Experience Highlights Systemic Failures

Melissa Hayhurst, a parent from London, has publicly rebuked Phillipson's remarks. Her daughter, Jessica, has complex needs and is non-verbal, relying on the Send framework for essential education and care. Hayhurst emphasizes that, like many across the UK, her family depends on legal protections to ensure her child receives entitled support, not out of choice but necessity.

Legal Action Taken Due to Government Consultation Flaws

Hayhurst explains that her decision to pursue legal action stemmed from the government's Send consultation, which proposes changes potentially weakening the enforceability of education, health, and care plans and limiting parental appeal rights. She criticizes the consultation for lacking transparency and failing to adequately seek input from affected families, arguing that such reforms require honesty and open debate rather than obscuring controversial aspects.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Lawyers Defended as Upholders of Justice

Contrary to Phillipson's accusations, Hayhurst asserts that lawyers in this field are not exploiting families but are fulfilling a crucial role under the rule of law. They ensure government proposals are lawful, fair, and subject to proper scrutiny, driven by a commitment to justice for vulnerable children. She highlights that these professionals often work tirelessly to protect the rights of those most in need.

Call for Systemic Improvements Over Adversarial Tactics

Hayhurst concludes that if ministers genuinely seek a less adversarial system, the solution lies not in attacking lawyers or diluting legal safeguards. Instead, the government should focus on ensuring children with special educational needs receive the support they are legally entitled to from the outset, thereby reducing the need for legal interventions and fostering a more supportive environment for all families.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration