Bridgend County Borough Council members clashed over a motion addressing freedom of speech, which was tabled by Restore Britain councillor Owain Clatworthy. The motion sought to condemn political violence, intimidation, harassment, and attempts to silence lawful democratic expression, while reaffirming support for open debate and respectful conduct.
Motion Sparks Chaotic Debate
The discussion, described by Clatworthy as addressing a 'growing culture of intimidation, political abuse, and hostility towards people who hold different views,' led to chaotic exchanges at the full council meeting. Councillor Martyn Jones welcomed the motion, noting he was saddened that behaviour had deteriorated to the point where elected members were reluctant to identify themselves publicly.
Amendments Proposed
Deputy leader Councillor Jane Gebbie proposed an amendment adding that any allegation of a member knowingly spreading misinformation or disinformation be referred to the monitoring officer for potential breaches of the Nolan Principles. She argued that free speech is strengthened when debate is based on fact and accountability. A second amendment by Councillor Ross Penhale-Thomas stressed that freedom of speech comes with responsibilities, requiring elected members to use care and avoid language that inflames division.
Councillor Jon Paul Blundell supported both amendments, claiming unnamed councillors had accused the authority of 'virtue signalling' over Pride flag profile pictures and shared offensive posts. Clatworthy rejected the amendments, calling them vague and amounting to 'free speech policing' that could turn political debate into conduct complaints.
Motion Passed With Amendments
Following the debate and a vote, the council passed the motion along with both proposed amendments. The largest independent group supported the second amendment but rejected the first due to concerns over defining 'misinformation,' which could penalise unintentional errors.
