WINK News, a broadcasting station based in Florida, has initiated legal proceedings against its former meteorologist, Matt Devitt, seeking $100,000 in damages. The lawsuit, filed by the Fort Myers Broadcasting Company, accuses Devitt of establishing a rival weather enterprise, WeatherView Inc., while still under employment with the station.
Allegations of Misconduct and Competition
The 60-page legal document, submitted on Monday, contends that Devitt utilised WINK resources to develop his independent business and attempted to persuade colleagues to join his venture. This action, according to the filing, breaches his employment agreement. The station is requesting a permanent injunction to compel Devitt to cease competitive activities and remove associated social media channels.
Dispute Over Termination Details
Devitt announced his dismissal on Facebook in January, describing it as an unexpected and unilateral decision that prevented an on-air farewell. However, the lawsuit challenges this narrative, asserting that his firing followed multiple disciplinary meetings. WINK General Manager Jamie Ricks noted in a memo that Devitt received written warnings, a suspension, and acknowledged that further violations could lead to termination.
The station cites a three-day unpaid suspension in November 2025 for conduct and scheduling issues, which Devitt reportedly acknowledged in writing. Additional allegations include attendance problems, such as tardiness and extended breaks, and claims of unprofessional email exchanges.
Gambling Accusations and Public Backlash
In a striking accusation, the lawsuit alleges that Devitt engaged in gambling during work hours and had a gambling problem. Furthermore, WINK claims that employees have faced significant public backlash, including death threats, following Devitt's firing, which has fueled the station's legal stance.
Devitt, a prominent figure in South Florida media, has not publicly commented on the lawsuit. WINK News declined to provide additional statements, with their attorney indicating that the lawsuit speaks for itself. The outcome of this case could set precedents for employment disputes in the broadcasting industry.
