The BBC's decision to axe BBC Two's Winterwatch as part of its cost-cutting drive has been branded a 'terrible' decision by disappointed fans, who argue the show is vital for understanding nature during the climate crisis. Viewers of the past 14 years plan to launch a bid to save it, though a similar effort for Autumnwatch failed despite 156,000 signatures.
Public Service Broadcasting Gem
Winterwatch is considered a prime example of public service broadcasting, bringing viewers news about British wildlife across seasons. However, its high production costs, requiring a large outside broadcast team, make it a target for cuts amid falling licence fee revenue. It follows Autumnwatch, axed in 2023 after 17 years.
Fan Reaction
Presenter Michaela Strachan had predicted the move, stating, 'I treat every Watch now as the possible last one, because who knows with television?' Fan Marian Pierce raged, 'There's enough rubbish on TV and the few decent things we all love to watch are taken off! Unbelievable.' Angela Johnson noted, 'I can't get out into nature at all through disability, and look forward to the Watches so much.'
Irony of Licence Fee
While cost-cutting is partly due to declining licence fee payments, the axing may drive more to stop paying. Lesley Ram moaned, 'What is the BBC up to? Don't they want me to pay my licence fee?' Anna Carpendale added, 'They axed Autumnwatch with the promise that we'd keep Springwatch and Winterwatch.'
Replacement and Future
Winterwatch will be replaced by a cheaper video podcast called Naturewatch. A BBC spokesperson said, 'The Watches is a much-loved brand... Naturewatch will allow us to deliver greater value to audiences all year round.' They added, 'In light of our funding challenges, we are having to make difficult choices.' Only Springwatch remains, returning for three weeks in May.
Presenter Chris Packham highlighted the show's ability to 'bring solace' through the natural world. Fans question why shows like Mrs Brown's Boys remain, while this gem is axed.
