Australian FIFO Worker Slams $180k Job Over 'S***' Conditions and Pay
Aussie FIFO Worker Criticises $180k Job Conditions

An Australian fly-in fly-out (FIFO) worker has launched a scathing critique of his high-paying mining job, claiming the substantial salary fails to compensate for the gruelling hours and subpar living conditions he endures. Despite earning an impressive annual income of up to $180,000, the fitter and turner expressed deep dissatisfaction, bluntly labelling his remuneration as 's***'.

High Earnings Mask Exhausting Work Schedule

The worker revealed he earns between $74 and $85 per hour, translating to a potential yearly salary of $180,000. However, he emphasised that this figure is misleading, as it stems from exhausting 84-hour work weeks. 'The only reason you get paid more [than in the city] is because you are doing 84 hour weeks,' he told Getahead. In contrast, he estimated he would only make around $40 per hour for a similar role in an urban setting, highlighting the premium paid for remote work.

Living Conditions Described as Unpleasant

Beyond the pay, the miner highlighted the dismal quality of life as a major drawback of FIFO work. He complained about accommodation shared with 'a bunch of divorcees' and described the food as 's***'. While acknowledging that the living quarters had air conditioning, he noted the necessity of wearing thongs in the shower, underscoring the lack of comfort. 'It's not that good,' he summarised, painting a bleak picture of post-work life.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Regret and Alternative Career Aspirations

Reflecting on his career choice, the worker expressed regret, stating he would prefer to work as a FIFO cleaner if given the chance to start over. He described cleaning roles as 'chill', with staff driving golf carts and primarily washing sheets, rather than dealing with more demanding tasks. 'They have got it chill,' he said, suggesting this job offers a simpler and more comfortable lifestyle compared to his current high-stress position.

Public Reaction and Online Debate

The miner's candid assessment sparked a heated debate among Australians online, with many disputing his complaints. One commenter calculated his weekly earnings at $6,300 based on an 84-hour week at $75 per hour, remarking, 'Hardly s*** pay.' Another pointed out the favourable roster of working one week on and one week off, which averages to 42 hours per week annually, allowing him to earn $180,000 while only working six months a year. 'Yeah I'd take that,' they added.

Counterarguments on Cleaning Roles

Others challenged his portrayal of cleaning jobs as easy. Multiple respondents argued that mine cleaning is hard work, especially for those who take pride in it, and is typically low-paid. 'Cleaners definitely do not have it chill on the mines,' one person asserted. Another noted, 'Cleaning is low-paid and is definitely not easy,' while a fourth described the role as stressful, saying cleaners are 'always under the pump'.

This controversy underscores the complex trade-offs in FIFO employment, where high salaries come with significant sacrifices in work-life balance and living standards, prompting broader discussions about job satisfaction in Australia's mining sector.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration